Subway Subway Franchise. conduct is improper, vulgar, unprofessional, and prejudice. Brookfield Ohio

Joseph Hray (the owner) was sued by the U.S. Labor Department. I commend anyone who takes a stand and sticks up for people with out a voice. The owner is unprofessional and will hire women because he is not afriad of them. If you check his employees you will notice there mostly women, and he treats his employee likes garbage anyway. Please take the time to look up the owner because he is all over the news and is in big trouble. I guess the article written by Nicholas was pretty much on point, superb.

Hello, I am the publisher of this report, and I would like to comment.

1) This report was written for time purposes & does not act as a professional essay. Personally, I wish to make certain modifications – I was unable to do so. I hope you understand the complexity here.

2) I fail to understand your comment – what is your agenda in posting? I advise you to spend less time on the world-wide-web as that may help you in future endeavors.

3) As for employment: at the time (2008), I was seeking a part time position as (food management) relates to my major; additionally, I was within distance to travel, and that is not odd. Furthermore (2013), I became a production & sanitary manager, smile. I hope you’re not puzzled anymore – if so…seek attention from a qualified healthcare professional. I find this will do you good -- it will keep you off of the internet, hopefully.

4) Stalk & harassment: I am not that creepy if you get to know me, smile. As for hanging out, I think you will find me at a university (lecturing/studying). I have absolutely no interest in so-so creepy fantasy of stalking & foreplay – that is a cheap shot men often take because of some uneducated fool who is out for financial gain (attention), which may be you, smile. However, I have enough credibility & stature minus the ego, smile.

5) As for sexual (gender discrimination): I refuse to tolerate such conduct, especially on the job. I find it to be inappropriate no matter the gender -- sexual orerintation. If you disagree, and still think this is odd…ok, once you experience this type of conduct/mistreatment…you will then understand…maybe you will relate. Unfortunately, you’re not there yet – maybe one day you will grow up & understand the point here. 

6) As for this particular article: this data was published on countless websites unbeknownst to me as well. As for moving on with this experience: I have no problem taking time out of my busy day to help another because discrimination is an issue in USA; furthermore, I feel (we) have to do our part to protect ourselves/others in the process. I am not embarrassed -- however, again, I feel bad for anyone who has to experience poor treatment – I will do my part to alleviate any pain or embarrassment. I feel your comment was limited & a pathetic attempt to discredit the publisher of this article. If you feel the need to publish comments, please – I would like you to publish your first-last name, and credentials. Personally, I have no problem publishing my information – simply, I have nothing to hide, but much more to expose.

First, I don't know if English is your first language and I'm not saying this to be rude or funny as you clearly cannot create a cohesive sentence and your misuse and misspelling of words is damaging to your seeming desire to be what you claim they were not:  professional.

Some examples:

The word is "staring" - not "stirring;"

"there is no need to be a hypocrite and disrespect another that isn't present- that is slander" - first, the term "hypocrite" is not accurate based on what you stated unless the woman/girl making the comment about the effeminate male employee was, herself, a very masculine-acting female.  If so,  THEN, you may accurately call her a hypocrite.  Second, you state that what she said about the other employee was slander.  For something to be slander, it must be proven false.  Since you admitted you never saw nor knew the male in question, the most you could say about this young woman was that she was rude.  Slander does not apply here.

I also find it puzzling that you felt the odd desire to pursue employment here?  Very strange.

Also, it probably doesn't help endear you to them when you take on the role of the "creepy" guy who "stalks" a female manager by hanging around her Subway Sandwich shot in a very rural Ohio town for over an hour waiting for her to come out of the backroom.

I think you might have been better served simply moving on from your experience and maybe just writing a short - SHORT and succinct letter, using proper grammar and not overly ambitious language that goes over the top to try to show you are a professional of some caliber that they've not yet experienced.

Peter, thanks for the comment. I tried with clarity. I apology, but I am reporting a actual 2 day event and full month of Subway Central 1800-talk-line which goes no where. Personally, I didn't want to leave out information. However, this & "common compaints" are getting around. I rather not add detail: I made copies of this sheet and many are taking interest. As I wrote, people have children- this disrespectful conduct occurs EVERY WHERE! In jobs, these managers/employees are obvious.

In addition, those who are subjected to this are afraid of the intimidation and that is understandable!! Lets be real, it isn't easy reporting and going public. My experience/name is public- that is embarassing- but that doesn't matter. What matters is, "I/others must/need to report this information." This vital and resource website is a tool and I'll use these grounds. I wrote my experience as is: I did the best I could and I am happy of where it's going.

You will never get a response from Subway based on the letter that you've posted here. Not only is your letter way to long for any corporate official to bother themselves with reading, but your main point gets lost in the many irrelevant details you've included.

If you expect your letter to be read and a response received, re-write your letter in a clear, succinct (1 page or less) manner.

Note, if anyone has dealt with this, or was present at this negative TIME-EVENT??? PLEASE SPEAK! Don't post nor express falsify information. Please include your first name and additional info. If you rather not, please don't speak. This is a factual experience and I want it to remain that way.

I would like to conclude,
I spoke to Subway Central! I am directed to the same person(s).


Just to add, I had to call "them" to hear results of investigation.


If they called prior? If I was unavailable? I apologize.



This is what was said,
Word: This person "referring to me" comes in "time-to-time."
Actuality: Not really, I use to come in to get a refill-of-drink. This was sometime ago- when former workers were employed. Also, I dislike to drink certain beverages. In complete, I recall my past visits. If they say I come in time-to-time, or through recent stages? Please observe camera footage! Last purchase made from this local is noted within this experience/complaint. Note: I have purchased from other common franchises- but differ local.


Word: The male was sitting for 20mins.
Actuality: False, I was sitting far longer- I documented this experience right after event. Just to state, the sitting period wasn't a issue, "IF the manager was truly BUSY." As noted within this experience: the manager/workers were fooling around. Cameras remain: if unedited footage exist, make available. Please observe and provide copy to me- personally, I would be glad to observe. Note: Full and unedited footage is the actual event- sound included! Content in edited formation isn't actuality!


Word: The footage was observed.
Information provided by Subway Central: Finally, I was given word on the investigation. I made sure to give indication of rip off report website. I told the worker, please direct this informative and vital website' to the main people/office; others are reporting common events. Continue- The worker pulled up complaint/investigation.


Just to note, I publish/sent complaint via: Short form-official Subway website & complete form-US mail. Strangely enough, I wish my complaint was constructed in actual format- reason for stating..Central Subway read my complaint over phone, pulling certain parts, and under false pretenses. Revolving around what they say concerning camera footage. This wasn't accurate: such as time and actual event. On the phone: The person told me, This case is closed- I don't care- this is not my problem [she didn't care about the website]. I am unsure if she forwarded this information. Truly, I believe others reported such experiences thru this line and hit a dead end.



Word: You've called here numerous times. This was investigated.
Actuality: Yes, I did call several times: 1, make a report-speak of complaint/experience- 2, to check for validation- 3, to check into investigation, and to report/speak of the rip off report website.


Word: I'll brain storm Subway Centrals sheet of the investigation:


1)This person referring to me comes in from time-to-time.


2) He sat for 20mins, went up to desk, spoke.


3) The local authorities report, this person is known for stirring up controversy.


Actuality: I found this to be at most interesting..... I keep to my self and dislike to invade anyones privacy. I speak up when abuse, or false accusations occur- my actions are proof! Just to include, I did request information such as, ?what authority figure? Can you provide information on this source- phone number? Answer, No. Total dead end!



4) He said he would post first name of manager on the internet.
Actuality: True but, I changed my mind. I was unsure if the manager provided a true name, I didn't want to post a false name. During this event, one worker was joking around-antics. Really, I had no idea if I was talking to antic or manager. In addition, I felt the investigation as a quack, and choose to provide this globally thru the internet! Central Subway put emphasis on, you shouldn't report this on the internet-etc. As for the manager, I will not post the managers name.


As for stirring up controversy? If that means: reporting/exposing poor/wrongful treatment, discrimination/ prejudice, and unethical people. HELL YES! With that noted, I would not lie, nor forward falsify info; I would never damage any positive/ethical/righteous' individual. As for this authority figure, I would like s/he to come forward. Please provide information that is so concealed- any event I report on ispublic! This experience isn't a joke and I am reporting the truth.


I would like to detail on my self: Recently, I achieved a drivers license, graduated from high school, and planning for college. Finally, I am looking into employment- I have the means such as transportation to pursue employment. Sadly enough, I ran into a bad system of people that are employed!


As for this investigation? Basically, minimum focus on this subway franchisee. The focus/investigation was on me: referring to unofficial indications to support their base of people. While reporting this- I was asked, why report this, where are you taking this, why call so much, why, why, why?


I spoke, I reported my complaint- seems to me. 'I don't see this taken seriously' and when I call this 1-800 number..? I am connected to the same 2 people- that's unfortunate. I think this was a total lack of assistance. Also, from what I gather, mail concerning thoughts & complaint go through that Central- hope my complaint makes it to the official people. I made this known, I am reporting for me and mostly for those who've dealt with this. A positive-productive person is interested in employment: Suddenly, s/he travels into a negative system and have to deal with laughing-stoke-of-people; staff. Anyone with children know of this- this is everywhere!


As for slander, reporting improper conduct isn't slander- I am reporting the facts. I have rights! The unofficial claims on me,? I was slandered! Also, I was directed to discontinue- the investigation was terminated. As for me, I'll continue to report/expose anyone that operates under this form of conduct.